===================================================================================
Review Form (Midterm Reports). CS525, Spring 2014. 
===================================================================================

This review form is anonymous. It will be seen only by the authors and Indy,
but will not be posted online. 

* Please do not mention your name anywhere in the review.*

Please remember that the review paper is not a complete paper, but is a 
work-in-progress. Hence, please try to keep your criticism constructive, in 
order to improve the quality of the paper. Besides technical criticism, do 
provide feedback on the quality of writing, etc. You may want to
follow guidelines similar to paper reviews you have already done in class. 
There is no limit on the length of the review!

* Confidentiality Policy and Ethics Code: By agreeing to this review, 
you are agreeing to (1) not reveal or discuss the ideas within your 
reviewed papers to anyone else other than Indy (not even your advisor 
or your colleague graduate students or any other faculty), and (2) not 
use or reuse these ideas in your own research directions until the 
review paper is accepted to be published in a conference/journal/workshop. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
0. Name and Authors of Review Paper:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Paper Summary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Briefly summarize the paper in your own words)

Type here...


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Reviewer's Scores (will be seen by the authors)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please assign an integer score between 1 through 5 (both inclusive) for each
category below. 1-Poor. 2-Fair. 3-Neutral. 4-Good. 5-Excellent.

Relevance to/appropriateness for CS525			      : 
Importance of Problem Addressed 			      :
Is relevant work cited completely?			      :
Originality of contribution				      :
Technical Correctness of Solution			      :       
Quality of Experimental Evaluation Methodology		      :  
Quality of Experimental Data				      :  
Quality of Writing, Presentation, and Paper Organization      : 
Impact: will this paper be important over time?		      : 
Your familiarity with the paper's subject matter	      : 
Overall recommendation for this paper (most important score!) :  


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Detailed Comments for the Authors (will be seen by the authors)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Please explain your ratings above. Provide constructive criticisms for the 
improvement of the paper, similar to the paper reviews you have written in 
class. Do provide feedback nits such as typos and grammatical or 
English errors. Be as concrete as you can about your suggestions.)

Type here...








---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Comments for Indy only (will NOT be seen by the authors)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Any brief comments that you have for Indy, about this paper. 
These will not be communicated to the authors.) 

Type here...









===================================================================================
End - CS 525 Review Form (Midterm Reports).
===================================================================================